Add your comment by filling out the form below in plain text. Comments are approved by a moderator and can be edited in accordance with RFAs Terms of Use. Comments will not appear in real time. RFA is not responsible for the content of the postings. Please, be respectful of others' point of view and stick to the facts.
I am sympathetic towards the Uighurs but I am surprised that the RFA can published a story thst is entirely based on the opinions, not facts, on one single, anonymous source whose background we know nothing about. If the revelation of the source's identify eould put him in a dangerous position, there should have been explanation of why this person is in the position to know, and what qualifies him to say sich a thing. As it is, just about anybody on the street can make such a claim and you're basing your entire story on this claim who may or may not be in the authority to know this for sure?I myself
is a journalist and this is just a basic standard we journalists should stick to.
[Editor's Note: As noted in our mission statement, RFA adheres to rigorous journalistic standards of objectivity, accuracy, and fairness.]
Mar 05, 2014 11:58 AM
Reply to this commentA crock of cow manure this story. Seems to justify this random massacre with a just cause. I hope China crushed this poison from their soil.
Mar 04, 2014 03:17 AM
Reply to this comment
This is disgusting. How do you kill 29 innocent civilians in "desperation"? Whatever situation they were facing, how does that justify murdering innocent civilians that had nothing to do with whatever persecution they faced in Xinjiang?
Shame on RFA for attempting to justify murder.
Mar 08, 2014 10:56 AM
Reply to this comment