All Comments for Rakhine Conflict Highlights Law Concerns

Add your comment by filling out the form below in plain text. Comments are approved by a moderator and can be edited in accordance with RFAs Terms of Use. Comments will not appear in real time. RFA is not responsible for the content of the postings. Please, be respectful of others' point of view and stick to the facts.







saif ali khan from rangoon :

who said rohingyas have been there for 4/5 generations? they have entered the country illegally. for those who enter illegally into any country, including the US, which government grants citizenship? Don't look at only the IK and US citizenship laws, you must also look at the Saudi Arabia's citizenship laws. We are happy to be Burma's Muslim citizens without entering illegally into Rangoon. Period.

Jul 02, 2012 05:46 PM

    Reply to this comment

Anis from London :

Wrong. Rohingas are living in Rakhaine/Arakan State for not less than 500 years and they did not enter there illegally. Pre British time Arakan and part of Bangladesh was one country. If Rakhaine state become independent of Burma today, burmese living in Arakan can not be illegal.

Aug 10, 2012 09:14 PM

Wai :

I believed that Rohingya are immigrants who enter Arakan about 150 years ago. They have never been recongnized by state law. However, since they have been in Arakan state for 4/5 generations, they should be granted citizenship or guest citizenship. The violent natures of both groups can be solved through rule of law.
Aung San Su Kyi is wise enough not to mess with what she does not possess political power to handle the case.
You see, currently Burma is ruled by National Security Councils which is remaint of past government. Even though I kind of trust President Thein Sein, all his words are not to be believed since he would be a figurehead leader restricted by the national Security council. Daw Su Kyi is after all a opposition of great influence but no significant power. Just be minded, it is Burma, not America or UK: State is ruled by guns and fear not by discipline and law.

Jun 22, 2012 04:04 AM

    Reply to this comment

Anonymous Reader :

DASSK should answer "yes or no"on citizenship right question for Rohingya.The journalist wants to know her view on Rohingya,not her political agenda.This issue is not by the rule of law, by the history of the Arakan state.

Jun 17, 2012 05:27 PM

    Reply to this comment

Return to story

CH. 1: MANDARIN | CANTONESE

CH. 2: VIETNAMESE | BURMESE | KOREAN

CH. 3: KHMER | LAO | UYGHUR

CH. 4: TIBETAN

More Listening Options

View Full Site