All Comments for China Stimulus Move Debated

Add your comment by filling out the form below in plain text. Comments are approved by a moderator and can be edited in accordance with RFAs Terms of Use. Comments will not appear in real time. RFA is not responsible for the content of the postings. Please, be respectful of others' point of view and stick to the facts.







Zhuubaajie from Hong Kong :

Adding liquidity for its own sake is wrong. But adding liquidity to grow specific industries can be a very powerful and purposeful move. Chinese construction firms enjoy a 30% cost advantage over Western ones. Beijing has the capital to fund infrastructure projects. This is not the time to be timid. It is time to go all out and grab meaningful market share in international infrastructure building.

May 28, 2012 02:57 PM

    Reply to this comment

Return to story

CH. 1: MANDARIN | CANTONESE

CH. 2: VIETNAMESE | BURMESE | KOREAN

CH. 3: KHMER | LAO | UYGHUR

CH. 4: TIBETAN

More Listening Options

View Full Site